<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.5.0 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.5.0.xsd" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.5.0" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" version="5.5.0">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>wseas-12059-20260917123324-6907eb</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20260917123324076</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>wseas/wseas</depositor_name>
      <email_address>wseas.group@gmail.com</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>WSEAS</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata language="en">
        <full_title>WSEAS Transactions on Heat and Mass Transfer</full_title>
        <issn media_type="print">1790-5044</issn>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2224-3461</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>05</month>
          <day>25</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>05</month>
          <day>25</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>21</volume>
        </journal_volume>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article publication_type="full_text" language="en">
        <titles>
          <title>Intervention Trajectories for Deep Energy Retrofit: a Comparative Assessment Across Climatic Contexts</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Carmela</given_name>
            <surname>Concilio</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, I-84084, ITALY</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Vincenzo M.</given_name>
            <surname>La Rocca</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Physics, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, I-84084, ITALY</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Giuseppe</given_name>
            <surname>Vicidomini</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Physics, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, I-84084, ITALY</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Gennaro</given_name>
            <surname>Cuccurullo</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>DepartmDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, I-84084, ITALYent of Physics, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, I-84084, ITALY</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xml:lang="en"><jats:p>Deep renovation of existing buildings is commonly planned according to the Fabric-First principle, with envelope improvements preceding heating-system upgrades. This study assesses whether a different ordering of the same retrofit measures can provide better intermediate energy and economic outcomes. Two cumulative trajectories are compared: a conventional Fabric-First sequence and a Low- Invasiveness-First sequence, in which system upgrades precede extensive insulation works. The analysis uses a coupled 0D–1D dynamic building–plant model, combining lumped energy balances for indoor zones and heating emitters with one-dimensional transient heat conduction through envelope components, driven by hourly Typical Meteorological Year data. The method is applied to a representative 1970s Italian apartment building in Salerno and Tolmezzo, representing mild Mediterranean and cold Alpine climates. Seasonal heating demand, operating expenditure, capital cost, and marginal cost-effectiveness are evaluated for each cumulative package. Both trajectories reach the same final configuration, but their intermediate performance differs. The Low-Invasiveness-First sequence generally yields lower operating costs at low and medium investment levels, especially in Salerno. Once the complete package is implemented, operating costs decrease by more than 70% in both locations. The results showthat retrofit sequencing can materially affect the timing and cost-effectiveness of renovation benefits.</jats:p></jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>09</month>
          <day>17</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>09</month>
          <day>17</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>88</first_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <item_number item_number_type="article_number">9</item_number>
        </publisher_item>
        <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:free_to_read/>
          <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2026-09-17">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.37394/232012.2026.21.9</doi>
          <resource>https://wseas.com/journals/articles.php?id=12059</resource>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref1"><unstructured_citation>N. Eyre, T. Fawcett, M. Topouzi, G. Killip, T. Oreszczyn, K. Jenkinson, and J. Rosenow, “Fabric first: is it still the right approach?” Buildings and Cities, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 965–972, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.388</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref2"><unstructured_citation>UNI, (text in Italian) Energy performance of buildings – Part 2: Determination of primary energy demand and system efficiencies for space heating, domestic hot water production, ventilation, and lighting in non-residential buildings (Prestazioni energetiche degli edifici – Parte 2: Determinazione del fabbisogno di energia primaria e dei rendimenti per la climatizzazione invernale, per la produzione di acqua calda sanitaria, per la ventilazione e per l’illuminazione in edifici non residenziali), Ente Italiano di Normazione Std. UNI/TS 11 300-2:2019, 2019, [Access Date: August 24, 2026]. [Online]. Available: https://store.uni.com/uni-ts-11300-2-2019</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref3"><unstructured_citation>E. Burman, D. Mumovic, and J. Kimpian, “Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the european directive for energy performance of buildings,” Energy, vol. 77, pp. 153–163, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.102</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref4"><unstructured_citation>G. Riva, G. Murano, V. Corrado, P. Baggio, and G. Antonacci, “(text in Italian) Definition of typical climatic years for the provinces of the Italian central and southern regions (Definizione degli anni tipo climatici delle province delle regioni italiane del centro sud (Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Lazio, Marche, Molise, Puglia, Sicilia, Umbria)),” ENEA, Tech. Rep. RdS/2011/9, 2011, [Access Date: August 24, 2026]. [Online]. Available: https://www.cti2000.it/index.php?action=show&amp;controller=pubblicazioni&amp;id=36573</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref5"><unstructured_citation>C. Concilio, P. Cucco, G. Di Ruocco, and G. Cuccurullo, “A handy model for the dynamic thermal response of the building-plant system,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 53, p. 103914, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103914</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref6"><unstructured_citation>Z. Zhang, C. Schiess, and F. Tillenkamp, “Main equations and thermal characteristics of radiators,” ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Fluid Engineering, Winterthur, Switzerland, Tech. Rep. 11(3), 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2536</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref7"><unstructured_citation>J. C. Lam, S. C. M. Hui, and A. Chan, “A statistical approach to the development of a typical meteorological year for Hong Kong,” Architectural Science Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 201–209, 1996. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1080/00038628.1996.9696818</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref8"><unstructured_citation>Building components and building elements – Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance – Calculation methods, International Organization for Standardization Std. ISO 6946:2017, 2017, [Access Date: August 27, 2026]. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/65708.html</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref9"><unstructured_citation>Thermal performance of building components – Dynamic thermal characteristics – Calculation methods, International Organization for Standardization Std. ISO 13 786:2017, 2017, [Access Date: August 27, 2026]. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/65711.html</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref10"><unstructured_citation>J. Tavares, A. Silva, and J. de Brito, “Computational models applied to the service life prediction of External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS),” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 27, p. 100944, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100944</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref11"><unstructured_citation>Z. Lin, T. Hong, X. Xu, J. Chen, and W. Wang, “Evaluating energy retrofits of historic buildings in a university campus using an urban building energy model that considers uncertainties,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 95, p. 104602, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104602</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref12"><unstructured_citation>A. Hesaraki, A. Ploskic, and S. Holmberg, “Integrating low-temperature heating systems into energy efficient buildings,” in Energy Procedia, vol. 78. Torino, Italy: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 3043–3048, 6th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.720</unstructured_citation></citation>
          <citation type="journal_article" key="ref13"><unstructured_citation>D. A. Pohoryles, D. A. Bournas, F. Da Porto, A. Caprino, G. Santarsiero, and T. Triantafillou, “Integrated seismic and energy retrofitting of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 61, p. 105274, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105274</unstructured_citation></citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
