<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<doi_batch version="5.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.4.0.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>NONE</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20260624104147389</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>wseas/wseas</depositor_name>
      <email_address>content-registration-form@crossref.org</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>content-registration-form</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>PROOF</full_title>
        <issn media_type="print">2944-9162</issn>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2732-9941</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_article>
        <titles>
          <title>Quantum-Inspired Fuzzy Destructive Interference for Low-Resource, High-Precision Intrusion Detection in Network Traffic</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Anas</given_name>
            <surname>Dahabiah</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Al-Sham Private University Damascus, SYRIA</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract>
          <jats:p>This paper presents the Quantum-inspired Fuzzy Destructive Interference (QFDI) model, a novel hybrid intrusion detection system that treats network flows as wave phenomena rather than static feature vectors. Normal traffic is encoded as a multi-dimensional reference wave; any test flow is subjected to destructive interference with this reference. Perfect cancellation indicates benign traffic, while residual energy—graded by a lightweight Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) comprising eight data-driven If-Then rules—indicates an attack. Experiments on the UNSW-NB15 benchmark dataset demonstrate that QFDI achieves a False Positive Rate (FPR) of 0.079, representing a 77.5% reduction compared to Random Forest (0.350) and a 76.5% reduction compared to XGBoost (0.336), while attaining a Precision of 0.903. QFDI deliberately trades higher recall (0.600) for significantly lower false positives, making it ideal as a high-precision second-stage filter in layered IDS architectures. The complete model requires only 39 numerical parameters and 0.30 KB of memory, enabling deployment on embedded and IoT devices where state-of-the-art deep learning models are computationally infeasible. QFDI is fully interpretable through eight linguistic rules, addresses alert fatigue in security operations centres, and requires no offline training phase.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>06</month>
          <day>24</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>06</month>
          <day>24</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>29</first_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <item_number item_number_type="article_number">4</item_number>
        </publisher_item>
        <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.37394/232020.2026.6.4</doi>
          <resource>https://wseas.com/journals/proof/2026/a08proof-004(2026).pdf</resource>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="ref0">
            <unstructured_citation>Y. Imrana, Y. Xiang, L. Ali, and Z. AbdulRauf, A bidirectional LSTM deep learning approach for intrusion detection, Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 185, 115524, 2021.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref1">
            <unstructured_citation>I. Ullah and Q. H. Mahmoud, A two-level flow-based anomalous activity detection system for IoT networks, Electronics, Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 530, 2021.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref2">
            <unstructured_citation>W. Lu and I. Traore, Detecting new forms of network intrusion using genetic programming, Comput. Intell., Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 475–494, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref3">
            <unstructured_citation>J. E. Dickerson and J. A. Dickerson, Fuzzy network profiling for intrusion detection, Proc. NAFIPS, pp. 301–306, 2000.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref4">
            <unstructured_citation>N. Moustafa and J. Slay, UNSW-NB15: A comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems, Proc. MilCIS, pp. 1–6, 2015.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref5">
            <unstructured_citation>D. Useche-Pelaez et al., A quantum-inspired classifier for intrusion detection in communication networks, IETE Tech. Rev., 2022.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref6">
            <unstructured_citation>L. Gong et al., Quantum-inspired neural network for intrusion detection, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, Vol. 18, pp. 3314– 3327, 2023.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref7">
            <unstructured_citation>S. Ganapathy et al., Intelligent feature selection and classification techniques for intrusion detection in networks, EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., Vol. 2013, No. 1, p. 271, 2014.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref8">
            <unstructured_citation>N. Moustafa and J. Slay, The evaluation of Network Anomaly Detection Systems: Statistical analysis of the UNSW-NB15 dataset, J. Inf. Security Appl., Vol. 31, pp. 18– 31, 2016.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref9">
            <unstructured_citation>K. Julisch, Clustering intrusion detection alarms to support root cause analysis, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Security, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 443–471, 2003.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref10">
            <unstructured_citation>R. Sommer and V. Paxson, Outside the closed world: On using machine learning for network intrusion detection, Proc. IEEE S&amp;P, pp. 305–316, 2010.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
