<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<doi_batch version="5.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.4.0.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>NONE</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20260910093927231</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>wseas/wseas</depositor_name>
      <email_address>content-registration-form@crossref.org</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>content-registration-form</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS</full_title>
        <issn media_type="print">1790-5060</issn>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2224-350X</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>01</month>
          <day>20</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>01</month>
          <day>20</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>20</volume>
        </journal_volume>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article>
        <titles>
          <title>Assignment of Multi-Region Generation Units Considering the Criterion of Optimal Switching of Transmission Lines</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Mauricio Bladimir</given_name>
            <surname>Toalombo</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga, ECUADOR</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Josue Steeven Ortiz</given_name>
            <surname>Malla</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Instituto Universitario Japón, Quito, ECUADOR</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Carlos Ivan</given_name>
            <surname>Quinatoa</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga, ECUADOR</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xml:lang="eng">
          <jats:p>This paper proposes a methodology for the problem of assignment of generation units in electrical power systems, by means of mixed integer nonlinear programming using GAMS. The problem posed finds the solution through the objective function and its associated restrictions, where the generation will be included and through the optimal switching of the assigned areas that minimises the cost of operation and achieves the optimal configuration of the proposed model in terms of costs and angle stability in a DC office, assuming the voltages with active power flow through the lines. The proposed methodology is carried out over a short 24-hour period, with varying hourly demands. The different generation plants are located to simulate a distributed generation model. Due to the system's complexity, maintaining load flow requires switching between three transmission lines while conserving the assigned load. For its validation, three scenarios were taken into account: isolated systems, interconnected systems, and systems incorporating the optimal switching model, where the objective function is obtained, evidencing the behaviour of the cases, the isolated areas presenting the highest cost, the interconnected model presents the lowest price, and the proposed model with a difference of $1,196 from the lowest cost.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>12</month>
          <day>09</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>12</month>
          <day>09</day>
          <year>2025</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>394</first_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <item_number item_number_type="article_number">31</item_number>
        </publisher_item>
        <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.37394/232016.2025.20.31</doi>
          <resource>https://wseas.com/journals/ps/2025/a625116-020(2025).pdf</resource>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="ref0">
            <unstructured_citation>T. Lan and G. M. Huang, “Transmission line switching in power system planning with large scale renewable energy,” in 2015 1st Workshop on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE), 2015. doi: 10.1109/SGRE.2015.7208740. DOI: 10.1109/SGRE.2015.7208740</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref1">
            <unstructured_citation>K. W. Hedman, R. P. O’Neill, E. B. Fisher, and S. S. Oren, “Optimal Transmission Switching with Contingency Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1577–1586, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113281. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2020530</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref2">
            <unstructured_citation>M. Lu, H. Nagarajan, E. Yamangil, R. Bent, S. Backhaus, and A. Barnes, “Optimal Transmission Line Switching Under Geomagnetic Disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2539–2550, 2018, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.01469. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2761178</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref3">
            <unstructured_citation>O. Hoseynpour, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, M. Nazari-Heris, and S. Asadi, “Application of Dynamic Non-Linear Programming Technique to Non-Convex Short-Term Hydrothermal Scheduling Problem,” Energies, vol. 10, no. 9, 1440, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091440. DOI: 10.3390/en10091440</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref4">
            <unstructured_citation>J. S. Ortiz, C. I. Quinatoa, and J. H. Acurio, “A New Model Optimization Convex Using Wirtinger Calculus for Economic Dispatch,” in 2024 8th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems Applications (ICoPESA), pp. 557–566, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOPESA61191.2024. 10743906. DOI: 10.1109/ICOPESA61191.2024.10743906</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref5">
            <unstructured_citation>L. Gan, N. Li, U. Topcu, and S. H. Low, “Exact Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow in Radial Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 72- 87, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014.2332712. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2332712</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref6">
            <unstructured_citation>J. Qi, K. Sun, and W. Kang, “Optimal PMU Placement for Power System Dynamic State Estimation Using Empirical Observability Gramian,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2041–2054, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.235679 7. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2356797</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref7">
            <unstructured_citation>S. Pinzon, D. Carrion, and E. Inga, “Optimal Transmission Switching Considering N-1 Contingencies on Power Transmission Lines,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 534–541, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9448535. DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9448535</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref8">
            <unstructured_citation>S. Zhang, C. C. Liu, X. Gu, and T. Wang, “Optimal transmission line switching incorporating dynamic line ratings,” in 2017 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGTEurope), pp. 1–5, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ISGTEurope.2017.8260139. DOI: 10.1109/ISGTEurope.2017.8260139</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref9">
            <unstructured_citation>P. Masache, D. Carrión, and J. Cárdenas, “Optimal transmission line switching to improve the reliability of the power system considering AC power flows,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 3281, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113281. DOI: 10.3390/en14113281</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref10">
            <unstructured_citation>M. Jabarnejad, “Approximate optimal transmission switching,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 161, pp. 1–7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2018.03.021. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.03.021</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref11">
            <unstructured_citation>A. Soroudi, Power System Optimization Modeling in GAMS. Springer, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62350-4. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62350-4</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref12">
            <unstructured_citation>E. Gil, J. Bustos, and R. Rudnick, “ShortTerm Hydrothermal Generation Scheduling Model Using a Genetic Algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1256–1264, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.819877. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.819877</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref13">
            <unstructured_citation>B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo and M. Nazari-Heris, Eds., Robust Optimal Planning and Operation of Electrical Energy Systems. Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04296-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04296-7</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref14">
            <unstructured_citation>F. Lombardi, P. S. and S. More, “Sharing economy as a new business model for energy storage systems,” Applied Energy, vol. 188, pp. 485–496, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.01 6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.016</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref15">
            <unstructured_citation>A. Robalino-López, A. Pilatasig, J. E. Játiva, and C. Falconí, “Reliability Assessment of the Ecuadorian Power System: Metrics, Vulnerabilities, and Strategic Perspectives,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 15, 5925, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123059. DOI: 10.3390/en18123059</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref16">
            <unstructured_citation>G. D. Price, Power Systems and Renewable Energy: Design, Operation, and Systems Analysis. Momentum Press, 2017. ISBN: 978- 1606505700.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref17">
            <unstructured_citation>B. Wang, L. Xie, S. Maslennikov, X. Luo, Q. Zhang, and M. Hong, “A Modal-Space Method for Online Power System SteadyState Stability Monitoring,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11033, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11033.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref18">
            <unstructured_citation>J. Oscullo Lala, G. Paredes, J. Játiva, and C. Falconí, “Characterization of Power System Oscillation Modes Using Synchrophasor Data and a Modified Variational Mode Decomposition Algorithm,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 11, 2693, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112693. DOI: 10.3390/en18112693</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
